Colosseum Tournament

[Gildarts]

I'm also saying that some judges just prefer to give people higher overall scores, so what might be a 2 or 3 to one judge might be a 3 or 4 to another.

I'm mainly saying that because, under the definition of the score card, a 10 is about site average (meaning that the majority of writers should fall around a 10) and Tartaros just scored a 19. Gildarts just scored it highly, and I don't want people who I've previously graded feeling like shit because they got just above our just below a 10.

Gildarts just scores things with higher numbers than I do, which is actually totally fine because she's still choosing a winner with a clearly defined numeric score to compare the two writers with.

*feels weird* I haven't scored anything yet?

Also, I feel compelled to say that I was not the judge who graded Tart's fight, and I don't think that I personally score higher than anyone else (Cause I haven't even graded my first fight yet </3), nor do I feel I would give anyone a biased score. If I feel like someone did a nice job in one category, I'll say as such by grading it correctly.