10-16-2015, 03:28 PM
I'm also saying that some judges just prefer to give people higher overall scores, so what might be a 2 or 3 to one judge might be a 3 or 4 to another.
I'm mainly saying that because, under the definition of the score card, a 10 is about site average (meaning that the majority of writers should fall around a 10) and Tartaros just scored a 19. Gildarts just scored it highly, and I don't want people who I've previously graded feeling like shit because they got just above our just below a 10.
Gildarts just scores things with higher numbers than I do, which is actually totally fine because she's still choosing a winner with a clearly defined numeric score to compare the two writers with.
Basically don't feel shitty because you see people getting hugely higher score cards than you got, because you were likely graded by me and the other dude was scored by another judge who has their own "average".
What's important is that you're getting C&C, you can see how the numbers in your card compares to the other writer, and a winner is decided.
I'm mainly saying that because, under the definition of the score card, a 10 is about site average (meaning that the majority of writers should fall around a 10) and Tartaros just scored a 19. Gildarts just scored it highly, and I don't want people who I've previously graded feeling like shit because they got just above our just below a 10.
Gildarts just scores things with higher numbers than I do, which is actually totally fine because she's still choosing a winner with a clearly defined numeric score to compare the two writers with.
Basically don't feel shitty because you see people getting hugely higher score cards than you got, because you were likely graded by me and the other dude was scored by another judge who has their own "average".
What's important is that you're getting C&C, you can see how the numbers in your card compares to the other writer, and a winner is decided.