Legacy & War [Base Assault; LAW vs. New Babylon] Discussion

[Proto Man]

I'm fine with a rest day in-between rounds to assess damage.

It might even make this whole thing easier to judge, since it'll give the judges a completely open day to read and start scoring notes as well?

Just a thought.

[Victor Wolfe]

Can i change my vote to : really dont mind, will join the majority vote xD

same as Yu, either way is cool with me.

[Dean Winchester]

I am pretty much indifferent and will do whatever. *shrugs* I don't see Dean backing out no matter what anyway.

[Demetri Malius]

Indifferent.

[Ganondorf]

Meh. S'all good.

[Thaal Sinestro]

My biggest concern is what's easiest/best for Adam and the other Judges. I know that doing damage between rounds would be slightly more time consuming, but it might also give them an easier time judging the overall? Whichever works better for them.

However, if the judges are totally indifferent, I vote towards doing damage every round. I kinda like the idea of people falling out of the fight due to injuries so long as the damage people are getting are justified in some viable, mechanical way and it's not just totally arbitrary.

I'm also not hell-bent on that or anything, so it doesn't bother me if we do it one way or another

[Gildarts]

I'm for damage dealt each round, provided it's not hard on our judge.I know after judging the colosseum that after just the end of the round I had to think back to the beginning, who did what, which words had the best flow, which actions were transparent, etc.

With a group this size, and something potentially explosive happening every round, it can be hard to remember and isolate who did what, w/o distinguishing factors. Things like the isolation verse, we know Gildarts and nealaphh are inside, but I don't want individuals to lose their chance to represent themselves.

Just a thought.

[Joline]

because i have been told i should make it known what i want done with my character, um
here's this
please don't banish me

have a good day/evening/night and good luck in the next round

[Bandit With No Name]

I think it's important that we know if it's gonna piss people off OOC if they get banished or whatever. We can try to plan something OOC for it to make sense IC.

If nobody knows your preferences, we can't meet them haha

[Todd Ingram]

I go where the story takes me, if it is banishment, so be it. Want it to be authentic and not steer it a specific way for it to fit my own needs and wishes. I enjoy the occasional curve ball ( did i do that right ? did i murica ?)

[Victor Wolfe]

Either way is fine with me, not going to complain about people using a legitimate game mechanic. IC my character might hold a bit of a grudge of course but OOC I wont.

[Bandit With No Name]

I really don't mind either way.

[Tom Marvolo Riddle]

Tom would prefer not being banished and I'm sure whoever ever banishes him will probably not like the repercussions unless Tom has some serious personality changes which... I doubt. From a strictly IC-sense.

Me personally I prefer not having to go through with it but I will if someone so inclined to do it anyway. No buts, no fuss, no coconuts.

[Bandit With No Name]

I mean, if we're all honest here, the quickest, easiest, and most sensible thing in MOST cases is, if you lose the fight and don't want to be banished, ruin away. There are gonna be a lot of people in exodus of Nippur, so getting the fuck out of Dodge should be pretty simple. If that doesn't work, we'll figure something else out.

[Ganondorf]

I'm cool either way.

[Gilgamesh]

Same

[Dean Winchester]

I am once again indifferent to this.

Though I will totally hate you forever! Or not, because I actually love all of you freaks for some strange reason. <3

[Demetri Malius]

I swear if i dont get banished. >.>

[Dean Winchester]

I swear if i dont get banished. >.>

Oh... don't worry about that! [/potentially empty threat?]

[Demetri Malius]

IT BETTER NOT BE :rage: