04-10-2016, 08:13 AM
(04-09-2016, 06:47 PM)Smithondorf Wrote: I actually voted for B and D.
B seems like a solid alternative to the classic DA, while still maintaining much of the initial feel of the game. And I like how our Fight writing determines who is eliminated and not, perhaps, luck or betrayals.
Put Survival Horror on anything and I'm always in. D is a nice divergence from the "everyone else has to die" way of things lately. I like that, in the end, everyone could survive. Surviving through a Saga is ALWAYS a plus.
The only option that doesn't involve people writing their own conflicts is Option A. All the others, participants will do the heavy lifting, and I'll just be in to do updates and/or resolution.
And I hope I made it clear that Option A is the only one where people have to kill or be killed. Option B and C provide the option to spare people (although in C you would have to fight against enemy soldiers). D is fighting optional but also would have a higher mortality rate (since people eliminated at the timed intervals would have a like, 1 in 2 chance of meeting grisly deaths at the hands of X, Y, or Z)
@Spur - I'd try to avoid putting two characters (or writers, for that matter) that can't get along in the same group.