01-19-2017, 07:53 AM
A word of advice for aspiring Judges: When you nominate a thread for Exceptional/Great, try and at least explain why you think it's worthy of being called that. Not only does it tell us staff that 'Ah, they legit read that and legit thought it was purdy good,' but it also gives the writer at least a modicum of feedback.
This is by no means a requirement (yet), but I think it's a nice practice to get into, especially if you potential Judges want people to buy into yer legitimacy.
The example I pulled is A+:
This is by no means a requirement (yet), but I think it's a nice practice to get into, especially if you potential Judges want people to buy into yer legitimacy.
The example I pulled is A+:
(01-18-2017, 12:40 PM)The Humble Sage Wrote: I'd like to nominate Curse of the High Tide for a great writing bonus. I've been consistently impressed by Vision's abilities to portray the internal workings off the android relative to what's outside, and speaking as a guy studying computer engineering, I have seen far worse examples of pseudo-code in my days. Likewise Frisk has been doing a great job of sticking to her character's pacifist origins, even though so much of the omniverse is designed around violence and conflict. Always cool when a concept character can stay strong through an extended period of time. The only reason I would say this isn't exemplary is length I believe, there's a lot of dialog, and the previously mentioned pseudo-code can make posts look longer than they actually are. All together though an excellent piece of writing from both authors! Go Omnivengers!
