10-03-2013, 01:28 PM
So, for example, a character like Captain America who has a not-quite superhuman DEF could get a Shield and defend against things like bullets? However, a character who is always defended, such as Tony Stark in his armor, would have a higher innate DEF, without having to buy a move called "armor" or whatever.
Is this interpretation close to correct?
Is this interpretation close to correct?


![[Image: sig2.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/KrimTheUnsettler/sig2.jpg)