07-06-2018, 11:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-06-2018, 11:17 AM by Dane Regan.)
(07-06-2018, 11:09 AM)Yu Kanda Wrote: now they are fine? no hard numbers? no fatigue cost? no damage indication? Where was this wisdom the last few months xD
"somewhat fine"....these are actual examples...how can you not recognize them as a standard for moves up for approval?
Fatigue cost and damage indication has never been needed in moves. Not since the last update almost a year ago, at least. But even before then, I don't think it was officially required. I will only ask for a fatigue cost if I think you need more drawbacks, and it'll be clear that's the reason why I'm asking for it.
Hard numbers also aren't needed, outside of dimensions (like sizes and ranges) or times. And even then, a rough estimate is fine. Like "about 10m range" "roughly 1m long". "As fast as an arrow" has also always been acceptable. If you wanna say "150mph" or "70m/s", that's your choice.
"Somewhat fine" is because many were approved far back and don't fit the required standards. As an example, Reverse Sign "Evil in the Mirror", doesn't provide any info for how the move is even used. Just "they can do this". Okay, do they do that instantly? Do they channel a little spell first?
Hence, mostly fine.