02-06-2018, 08:18 AM
@Emps: I mean, even then. You're standing still for ages. People will hit you. You won't get to use them. Also, a round is about 10 minutes, usually. So you can use that number instead in your first paragraph.
@Hijiri: You can just say that they're strong, sharp and will pierce most opponents. It doesn't need to be needlessly complex with references to attack. If you want to see if you can smash concrete with your move, look at your ATK stat and then look on the table. If your move has a charge time or drawbacks and is really powerful, you can bump it up a bit on the table. As long as you're not expecting to shred steel armour of someone with 5 DEF with your 2 ATK, you're good. The powerful thing is just so people can have an idea whether it sits a bit above or below where 2 ATK does on the table. Also, I'd say that this shouldn't really be piecing full plate with 2 ATK. Maybe with 4 or 5 ATK. Not with 2. I guess the numbers all seem like a big fudge to you, but you'll have a lot less strife if you just write down how comparatively strong or weak it is compared to your general strength.
@Hijiri: You can just say that they're strong, sharp and will pierce most opponents. It doesn't need to be needlessly complex with references to attack. If you want to see if you can smash concrete with your move, look at your ATK stat and then look on the table. If your move has a charge time or drawbacks and is really powerful, you can bump it up a bit on the table. As long as you're not expecting to shred steel armour of someone with 5 DEF with your 2 ATK, you're good. The powerful thing is just so people can have an idea whether it sits a bit above or below where 2 ATK does on the table. Also, I'd say that this shouldn't really be piecing full plate with 2 ATK. Maybe with 4 or 5 ATK. Not with 2. I guess the numbers all seem like a big fudge to you, but you'll have a lot less strife if you just write down how comparatively strong or weak it is compared to your general strength.