| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.3.31 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
The Scramble OOC Discussion - Printable Version +- Omni Archive (https://omni.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: Discussion Forums (https://omni.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Omniverse Discussion (https://omni.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: The Scramble OOC Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=64) |
Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Eighteen - 08-30-2013 >.> How would YOU know? Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - PepsiWhirda - 08-30-2013 I think the only difficulty is trying to account for 10+ characters without any discernible post order or plot. Hopefully the group splits up a bit once we learn about the gates and we can get into some more dynamic stuff. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Illidan Stormrage - 08-30-2013 Doing up a post now. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Violet - 08-30-2013 Is any one else writing or going to write? I don't want to step on toes. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Eighteen - 08-30-2013 I'll post later tonight so I'll wait for you for sure Laura. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Violet - 08-30-2013 Awesome. I was gonna play off your post if that's okay Gonna grab a shower real quick and get writing.
Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Eighteen - 08-30-2013 Sounds good to me!
Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Proto Man - 08-30-2013 I'mma start posting once Garona finishes (yes that's a clever excuse to put off being productive) Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Violet - 08-30-2013 Posted. :accepted: Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Omni - 08-30-2013 Not sure if you realised, from that last post, but there are two groups - one in the East, one in the West (the Kingdom and Empire, respectively) Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Nanoha Takamachi - 08-30-2013 Yeah I think a couple of us have pointed it out? Ah well, the continuity here is going to be pretty janky with 10 of us anyway. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Violet - 08-30-2013 I was only wanting to focus on one group to go after. I can't go after both <.< I noticed you guys had pointed out more than one set of observers. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Omni - 08-30-2013 I just updated Samus's profile with some stats, fyi: Height without suit: 5'9" Height with suit: 6'3" Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Ganondorf - 08-30-2013 I need to do that eventually myself... whenever I get the motivation to. Lol! Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Omni - 08-30-2013 I went ahead and dismissed Nintendo's new figure of 5'3" for Samus's height without the suit. Because fuck you, Nintendo. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Ganondorf - 08-30-2013 You better be careful. Reggie Fils-Aime knows where you live and his body is ready. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Nanoha Takamachi - 08-30-2013 The suit is meant to be a full foot taller? What the hell, does it have stilts or something? Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Violet - 08-30-2013 It's like, half a foot <,< Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Omni - 08-30-2013 oh god And well, actually Nanoha they originally said she was 6'3" WITHOUT the suit. Now, that seems a little over-the-top amazonian to me, but it seems about right for her with the suit. But I also always saw her as a tall lady regardless, and I think most people did. Hence my figure of 5'9". Changing her from 6'3" to 5'3" is just too much, NINTENDO. Re: The Scramble OOC Discussion - Nanoha Takamachi - 08-30-2013 ahh that makes a bit more sense, then. How big was the suit originally, if she was 6'3"? |