| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.3.31 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Printable Version +- Omni Archive (https://omni.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: Discussion Forums (https://omni.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Omniverse Discussion (https://omni.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline (/showthread.php?tid=3195) |
Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Tom Marvolo Riddle - 11-23-2015 Sasuke Uchiha Wrote:Arthuria Pendragon Wrote: A railroad is rarely ever a good call for a GM to do to their players. If anything it generates ill will towards the circumstances a person is being shoved into. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Guu - 11-23-2015 Sasuke Uchiha Wrote:I am only going to touch on the parts I have in bold. Diablo has the only exit and aiding his cause IS the only way out, however, no one said your character had to WILLINGLY do this. I agree in that we shouldn't force your character to act in a way they wouldn't, but nothing is stopping you from having your Character FORCED into service. It's hell, you could have your character chained and prodded the whole time. But that's still good enough to permanently ruined a good-alligned character. You can't say you stand for all that's good and justice if you've allied with the devil, even accidentally. Not to mention you could be disowned from every major faction over it, especially if it's common knowledge you've been banished. For example, I'm not sure how I could justify Guu continuing being a faction leader since her very presence at the top will make it difficult to get allies. I'd be forced to chose between working 10x as hard to win over everyone or just have my character stand down. The quest as it is written could potentially ruin anyone's planned storylines. Generally, I would have no problem with this considering it's hell, but keep in mind that people are willing to bust out banishment circles for trivial things like base assaults, bounties no matter the severity of the crime, or simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time (in the case of Vi.) People on the surface treat banishment so lightly while people who are trapped down there are required to treat it like the harshest punishment to ever happen. That is not fair to the player considering how much is sacrificed on a whim. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Tom Marvolo Riddle - 11-23-2015 Guu Wrote:But that's still good enough to permanently ruined a good-alligned character. You can't say you stand for all that's good and justice if you've allied with the devil, even accidentally. Not to mention you could be disowned from every major faction over it, especially if it's common knowledge you've been banished. For example, I'm not sure how I could justify Guu continuing being a faction leader since her very presence at the top will make it difficult to get allies. I'd be forced to chose between working 10x as hard to win over everyone or just have my character stand down. The quest as it is written could potentially ruin anyone's planned storylines.A base assault personally is a very good reason to banish especially if its happened twice before. It sets a precedent that the owners of said base won't stand for people trying to rape and pillage their people and steal their stuff for simple greed and preconceived notions that have no basis in reality. While greed may be eternal, so will good punishment to deter a repeat offense against the same person. Its not the best solution. But as it is now, there is nothing stopping a person from dying and coming back to assault the same base again over and over again trollishly since moving bases is not exactly easy. But beyond that and artefact head hunter? Yeah its a pretty harsh punishment that's meted out way to easily. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Guu - 11-23-2015 Tom Marvolo Riddle Wrote:A base assault personally is a very good reason to banish especially if its happened twice before. It sets a precedent that the owners of said base won't stand for people trying to rape and pillage their people and steal their stuff for simple greed and preconceived notions that have no basis in reality. While greed may be eternal, so will good punishment to deter a repeat offense against the same person. Its not the best solution. But as it is now, there is nothing stopping a person from dying and coming back to assault the same base again over and over again trollishly since moving bases is not exactly easy. Well, I sort of can see that, though in the NB base assault, even the people committing the assault are preparing to banish if they win. Edit: Unless if they changed stance on that and I missed it. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Tom Marvolo Riddle - 11-23-2015 Guu Wrote:Oh goody, I hope when Tom gets out that their characters have made appointments with the Coruscant Asylum. They are going to need it.Tom Marvolo Riddle Wrote:A base assault personally is a very good reason to banish especially if its happened twice before. It sets a precedent that the owners of said base won't stand for people trying to rape and pillage their people and steal their stuff for simple greed and preconceived notions that have no basis in reality. While greed may be eternal, so will good punishment to deter a repeat offense against the same person. Its not the best solution. But as it is now, there is nothing stopping a person from dying and coming back to assault the same base again over and over again trollishly since moving bases is not exactly easy. I am not joking about this either. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - The Dreamer - 11-23-2015 I would just like to add a couple of my own cents. I think Tom's suggested versions of additional Questlines is a very good example for a basis of mew questlines that will meet the needs of the many. I think, that if's it not already being done, that they should heavily be looked at by those in charge as a basis for new questlines, or at least inspirations for the angles to take when approaching new questline creation for the Underverse. I have to agree with the stance on the inexpensiveness of Banishment Circles. The cost of 250OM and a win is, imo, to little for the winning party to balance out the costs the loser must deal with. Not only must they write quite the piece to return from the Underverse, but then for the rest of their IC life, they must deal with what is essentially the type of discrimination that some parolee's get when leaving prison, but to a magnitude so severe that it really could and probably would taint their IC life permanently. And I dont know about you, but if i were to play a character that was good-aligned, i know i would be hard-pressed to deal with that. Edit: As a alternative to Banishment Circles that would add to the difficulty of their use, they could be reworked into physical places in the world that have been turned into Banishment circles as they function now, but are that way because of their already weak veil between this world and the Underverse. This would result in the ability to still banish Primes, but instead of doing it when you feel like it, your target must be taken as a prisoner, and brought to this place. Similar in form to how prisoners are caught and captured, then transported for execution. Changes the focus from and everyman's solution to more of a problem solver for institutions of govt or faction. Or you could lure your target to fight you near the In-World Circle for easier transport. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Schwi Dola - 11-23-2015 I would like to point out that one of two banished has been stuck there for almost half of a year ooc. That is a very long time. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Thaal Sinestro - 11-23-2015 Overall: I wish there were different ways to get out. I'm kind of in favor of a, "Write literally any 20k words, and you can be free" system. Yes, 20k is a lot. that's also sort of the point? Maybe less though. Unsure. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - The Dreamer - 11-23-2015 Proto Mouse Wrote:(Here) Nothing in the quest description says that. To be fair, no one has said anything otherwise in any capacity. Vague or not. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Naruto Uzumaki - 11-23-2015 What if one was to say... become a champion at the arena, and instead of becoming Diablo's lackey they make a deal? Like say if you win something like, oh I don't know a Rock-Off of some sort then you get free passage from the Underverse. But if you lose you have no choice but to be his lackey? Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Guu - 11-23-2015 I wonder, if multiple people do the quest at once, do they have to fight each other to decide who escapes? I wonder if the remaining have to do the quest again... Sorry for all the frustration, Proto.
Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Schwi Dola - 11-23-2015 The Dreamer Wrote:Proto Mouse Wrote:(Here) Nothing in the quest description says that. Only way out is ally Diablo. Therefore you must be evil or sign a pact to side with evil. Geno could not complete the quest because he could never ally Diablo. He would either help Tyreal or other good people that have been banished but he would never escape the Underverse. His story ends. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Roger Smith - 11-23-2015 I would just like to point out that nowhere, at any point, in any capacity, does it mention anything along the lines of needing to become Diablo's lackey. You don't have to work for Diablo, you don't have to sign any pact, you don't have to become his minion, lackey, join his army, or anything. All you have to do is impress him enough in some capacity that warrants you being worth the trouble for him to get his giant demonic ass off his throne to send you back topside. I don't know where the idea that you have to become Diablo's ass-clown minion to get out of the Underverse came from, but it's not true. By a long shot. And it is incredibly frustrating. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Tom Marvolo Riddle - 11-23-2015 You know.. all you need to get out of the underverse is: An eye patch, a goatee, a waist sash, a cat that always wants to be held and the ability to monologue. That's all. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Guu - 11-23-2015 Quote:If you can prove your worth to the Prime Evil, Diablo, he may see fit to send you to the world above; an agent of his unfathomable schemes. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Roger Smith - 11-23-2015 Guu Wrote:Quote:If you can prove your worth to the Prime Evil, Diablo, he may see fit to send you to the world above; an agent of his unfathomable schemes. If this is in reference to the whole "joining Diablo" thing, it does nothing but reinforce my point. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - The Dreamer - 11-23-2015 "an agent of his unfathomable schemes." That seems to be the operative phrase in this discussion so far. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Guu - 11-23-2015 While it doesn't outright force your character evil, or to willingly join him, the fact that you're still a pawn is enough to derail a character. Edit: can be enough to derail a character, some characters wouldn't be weighed down so much
Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Roger Smith - 11-23-2015 I mean, as I've said before, maybe the simple act of you being back topside at all is enough. Diablo is the Lord of Terror. Him sending you back topside could be all he needs to do to get the terror flowing, to let people know there IS a way back out of the Underverse, and to get them to panic and lose that sense of relative security that the Underverse is the most secure place there is, that it's an unescapable Hell. That seems pretty clearly like you're being an agent of his schemes just by existing. Re: Concerns regarding Underverse & the questline - Zack Fair - 11-23-2015 My original alt character idea was sort of a loose cannon good guy, who I had a full Underverse quest imagined for. It would end with him being sent back up by Diablo, not because he began working for him, but instead because Diablo saw him as someone that would help destabilize the Omniverse in preparation for his return. So he would have technically been Diablo's pawn, unknowingly and unwittingly. Whether it worked would remain to be seen. That's just one interpretation of that single sentence. That said, the discussions have made it abundantly clear to me that I don't have a damn clue about the Underverse and escaping it, so I'm checking out of this one and hoping I don't get sent there any time soon. |